Aporte del análisis de colecciones a las modalidades de aprovisionamiento: El caso de los sitios cantera-taller del Valle de Yocavil (Noroeste Argentino) [Contribution to the analysis of collection procurement mechanisms]

  • Juan Pablo Carbonelli CONICET. Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
Keywords: Yocavil Valley, lihic quarry, collections, hunter-gatherers, bifaces

Abstract


Contribution to the analysis of collection procurement mechanisms: The case of the quarry workshop sites of Yocavil Valley (Northwest Argentina)

In this paper we propose to analyze and compare four collections of artifacts, which come from surface sites located south of the Calchaquíes Valleys. The quarry-workshop sites from Ampajango, El Bordo and Los Zazos have been previously studied and some of its parts are in the Museum of Natural Sciences of the National University of La Plata and in the Museum of Anthropology of the National University of Rosario, both in Argentina. These sites had been characterized as the first hunter-gatherer occupations in the valley of Yocavil (Cigliano 1964; 1968), mainly conformed by bifaces, scrapers and cores, most of them covered by a particular rock coating (rock varnish), which is desert varnish.

In this paper we offer a revision and a new interpretation of such artifact assemblages.

The questions that guide our work are: Will a new analysis of these collections allow us to observe complex processes such as reuse-recycling? What role did these spaces have at a regional level in sourcing decisions and exploitation of raw materials?

By looking at the collections we have detected two problems. First, a greater presence of desert varnish on the parts collected during our fieldwork (Carbonelli 2013) in comparison with the ones in the above named collections. This variable is particularly relevant because a greater number of artifacts with varnish present are more likely to reveal cases of reuse-recycling; that is to say temporal difference between different sets of flaked stone. To solve this problem, we conducted a Chi2 analysis in order to test the null hypothesis of the absence of a difference between the proportions of artifacts with varnish from our collections and museum collections.

Secondly, we detected an existing imbalance between the high frequency of knapping tools in detriment of debitage and cores in museum collections. In order to quantitatively address the diversity of each set, we compared the typological classes of each of the matching sets. Diversity is a way of measuring the variation since it describes attributes of a population composed of classes (attributes) that vary in frequency (wealth), which allows us to discuss structural issues of the sample. To explore the richness we use indicators that are not too sensitive to sample size, such as the Simpson Dominance Index and Eveness.

From the methodological aspect, statistical analysis allowed us to recognize the biases that built the samples. The Chi2 tests indicate to us that there is a lower proportion of artifacts with desert varnish in the collections than what would fit reality. This manifests mainly in the absence of cases of reuse-recycling, evident in the differences of varnish between flaked artifacts. Moreover, the analysis of diversity warns us that there is an over-representation of finished tool type artifacts in collections, which makes difficult the description of the production sequence. Based on these biases, through techno-morphological analysis we characterized the lithic production of quarry-workshop sites. Generally speaking, they present an expeditious technology comprises of amorphous cores and partial bifaces, which were then used as cores.

Even in the case of bifaces, there was no great effort put into their production, since many of them were still in the process of being knapped. The presence of an informal component in sets are also denoted by the presence of cortex in most knapped artifacts resulting in sequences of short reductions, without achieving a complete knapping of both sides.

This low knapping of the sets is explained if we combine these observations with the results of our survey of potential and effective sources of raw materials (Carbonelli 2012, 2013b). The pieces of the collections come from places close to areas of good to fair quality raw materials, so expeditious technology with a small holding of bifaces and cores is consistent.

Author Biography

Juan Pablo Carbonelli, CONICET. Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
CONICET. Museo Etnográfico, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Estados Unidos 3387 3º A Lanús Oeste, Argentina

References

Andrefsky, W. 1994, Raw-material availability and the organization of technology. American Antiquity, 59 (1): 21-34. (en inglés; in English) (“Disponibilidad de materia prima y la organización de la tecnología”) doi:10.2307/3085499
Aschero, C. A. 1975, Ensayo para una clasificación morfológica de artefactos líticos aplicados a estudios tipológicos comparativos. Informe presentado al CONICET. Buenos Aires, 113 p. (in Spanish) (“Test for morphological classification of lithic artifacts applied to comparative typological studies”)
Aschero, C. A. 1983, (Revisiones) Ensayo para una clasificación morfológica de artefactos líticos. Apéndices A y B. Cátedra de Ergología y Tecnología. UBA. Informe presentado al CONICET, Buenos Aires, 180 p. (in Spanish) (“Test reviews for morphological classification of lithic artifacts. Appendices A and B”)
Aschero, C. A. & Hocsman, S. 2004, Revisando cuestiones tipológicas en torno a la clasificación de artefactos bifaciales. In: Temas de arqueología, análisis lítico (Acosta, A., Loponte, D. & Ramos, M., Eds.), Universidad Nacional de Luján, Luján: p. 7-25. (in Spanish) (“Reviewing typological issues surrounding the classification of bifacial artifacts”)
Baied, C. & Somonte, C. 2012, Mid-Holocene geochronology, palaeoenvironments, and occupational dynamics at Quebrada de Amaicha, Tucuman, Argentina. Quaternary International, 299: 80-89. (en inglés; in English) (“Geocronología de Holoceno medio, paleoambientes y la dinámica de ocupacional en la Quebrada de Amaicha, Tucumán, Argentina”) doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2012.11.025
Beck, C. & Jones, G. 1990, Toolstone Selection and Lithic Technology in Early Great Basin Prehistory. Journal of Field Archaeology, 17: 283-299. (en inglés; in English) (“La selección de piedra para las herramientas y la tecnología lítica en la prehistoria temprana de la Great Basin”) doi:10.2307/530023
Beck, C., A., Taylor, G., Jones, C., Fadem, C., Cook, S., Millward. 2002, Rocks are heavy: Transport cost and Paleoarchaic quarry behavior in the Great Basin. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21: 481-507. (en inglés; in English) (“Las rocas son pesados: El costo del transporte y el comportamiento de cantera Paleoarcaico en la Great Basin”) doi:10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00007-7
Bellelli, C. 2005, Tecnología y materias primas a la sombra de Don Segundo. Una cantera-taller en el valle de Piedra Parada. Intersecciones en Antropología, 6: 75-92. (in Spanish) (“Technology and raw materials in the shadow of Don Segundo. A quarry workshop in the valley of Piedra Parada”). URL: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1850-373X2005000100007&script=sci_arttext
Carbonelli, J.P. 2011, “Motivos porque y para” en la tecnología lítica de un sitio formativo en el Valle de Yocavil, provincia de Catamarca. Intersecciones en Antropología, 12: 31-45. (in Spanish) (“Reasons for and" lithic technology in a training site in the Valley of Yocavil province of Catamarca”). URL: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1850-373X2011000100003&script=sci_arttext
Carbonelli, J.P. 2012, Base regional de recursos líticos y fuentes de materias primas al sur del Valle de Yocavil. Estudios Sociales del NOA, 12: 111-137. (in Spanish) (“Regional basis of lithic resources and raw materials sources of south Yocavil Valley”). URL: http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/esnoa/article/view/787
Carbonelli, J.P. 2013a, El sitio Ampajango, cincuenta años después. Arqueología, 19 (1): 41-64. (in Spanish) (“The Ampajango site, fifty years later”). URL: https://sites.google.com/site/reviarqueol3/home/arqueologia-19
Carbonelli, J.P. 2013b, Técnicas líticas en paisajes cazadores y agropastoriles al sur del valle de Yocavil. Doctoral Thesis at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires. 502 p. (in Spanish) (“Lithic techniques in hunter and agro-pastoralist landscapes in the south of the Yocavil Valley”)
Church, T. 1994, Terms in Lithic Resource Studies: Or, is this a Lateritic Silcrete or a Ferruginous Woodgrained Chert? In: Lithic Resource Studies: A Sourcebook for Archaeologists (Church, T., Ed.), Lithic Technology Special Publication Vol. 3, Department of Anthropology, University of Tulsa, Tulsa: p. 9-25. (in en inglés; in English) ("Terminología en el estudio de los recursos líticos: O, este es un silcrete lateríticos o una sílex ferruginosa con grano de madera?")
Cigliano, E. 1961, Noticia sobre una nueva industria precerámica en el Valle de Santa María (Catamarca): El Ampajanguense. Anales de Arqueología y Etnología, 16: 169-179. (in Spanish) (“News about a new pre-ceramic industry in the Valle de Santa María (Catamarca): The Ampajanguense”)
Cigliano, E. 1964, El precerámico en el N. W. Argentino. Separata de Arqueología de Chile Central y áreas vecinas, 1: 191-196. (in Spanish) (“The preceramic in N. W. of Argentina”)
Cigliano, E. 1968, Panorama general de las industrias precerámicas en el noroeste argentino. Actas del XXXVII Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, 3: 339-344. (in Spanish) (“Overview of preceramic industries in northwestern Argentina”)
Cigliano, E., Bereterbide, S., Carnevali, B., Lorandi, A.M. & Tarragó, M. N. 1962, El Ampajanguense. Publicación del Instituto de Antropología, 5: 7-104. (in Spanish) (“The Ampajanguense”)
Civalero, M.T. & Franco, N.V. 2003, Early human Ocuppation at the West of Santa Cruz province, Southern End of South America. Quaternary Internacional, 109-110: 77-86. (en inglés; in English) (“La ocupación humana temprana en el oeste de la provincia de Santa Cruz, la extensión meridional de América del Sur”) doi:10.1016/S1040-6182(02)00204-5
Durando, P. M. García Salemi & G. Platanía. 1986, Estudios geomorfológicos; paleoclimas, dataciones relativas y tipología a partir de paleolitos del Valle de Santa María (Provincias de Catamarca y Tucumán, República Argentina). Actas y Trabajos del VI Congreso Peruano: Hombre y Cultura Andina, 6: 89-109. (in Spanish). (“Geomorphological studies; paleoclimates, relative dating and typology from paleolitos del Valle de Santa María (provinces of Catamarca and Tucuman, Argentina)”)
Elías, A. 2010, Estrategias tecnológicas y variabilidad de los conjuntos líticos de las sociedades tardías en Antofagasta de la Sierra (Provincia de Catamarca, Puna Meridional Argentina). Doctoral Thesis at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires. 541 p. (in Spanish) (“Technological strategies and variability of lithic assemblages of late societies in Antofagasta de la Sierra (Province of Catamarca, Argentina Southern Puna”)
Escola, P. 2000, Tecnología lítica y sociedades agropastoriles tempranas. Doctoral Thesis at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires. 430 p. (in Spanish) (“Lithic technology and early agropastoral societies”)
García Salemi, M. & Durando, P. 1985, Sobre cronologías y paleoclimas en la Quebrada de Amaicha. Centro Estudio Regiones Secas, 2(2): 1-4. (in Spanish) (“About chronology and paleoclimate in the Quebrada de Amaicha”)
Hocsman, S. 2006, Producción lítica, variabilidad y cambio en Antofagasta de la Sierra -ca. 5500-1500 AP. Doctoral Thesis at the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Museum, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina. 532 p. (in Spanish) (“Lithic production, variability and change in Antofagasta de la Sierra -ca. 5500-1500 AP”)
Hocsman, S. & Escola, P, 2007, Inversión de trabajo y diseño en contextos líticos agro-pastoriles (Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca). Cuadernos del Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoaericano, 21(2006-2007): 75-90. (in Spanish) (“Investment design work and agro-pastoral contexts lithic, Antofagasta de la Sierra, Catamarca”)
Kelly, R. 1988, The three sides of a biface. American Antiquity, 53 (4): 717-734. (en inglés; in English) (“Los tres lados de un biface”) doi:10.2307/281115
Nami, H. 1992, El subsistema tecnológico de la confección de instrumentos líticos y la explotación de los recursos del ambiente: una nueva vía de aproximación. Shincal 2: 22-53. (in Spanish). (“Technological subsystem making stone tools and exploiting the resources of the environment: a new avenue of approach”).
Paulides, L. 2006, El núcleo de la cuestión. El análisis de los núcleos en los conjuntos líticos. In: El modo de hacer las cosas. Artefactos y ecofactos en Arqueología, (Pérez de Micou, C., Ed.), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires: p. 67-101. (in Spanish) (“The core of the matter. Analysis of cores in lithic assemblages”)
Ruiz Huidobro, O. 1972, Descripción Geológica de la Hoja 11E Santa María, provincias de Catamarca y Tucumán: Carta geológico-económica de la República Argentina, escala 1:200.000. Boletin Vol. 134. Dirección Nacional de Minería, Servicio Nacional Minero Geológico, Buenos Aires. 64 p. (in Spanish) (“Geological description of sheet 11E, Santa Maria, provinces of Catamarca and Tucuman: Geological-economic map of the Argentine Republic, scale 1:200,000”)
Spano, R. 2011, Primera sistematización de las características estilísticas de la alfarería fina del sitio Soria 2 (Valle de Yocavil, Noroeste Argentino). Revista del Museo de Antropología, 4: 127-144. (in Spanish) (“First systematisation of the stylistic characteristics of fine pottery of the Soria 2 site (Yocavil Valley, Northwest Argentina)”) URL: http://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/antropologia/article/view/5492/
Somonte, C. 2009, Tecnología lítica en espacios persistentes de Amaicha del Valle (Tucumán). Doctoral Thesis at the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires. 395 p. (in Spanish) (“Lithic technology in persistent spaces of Amaicha del Valle, Tucumán”)
Somonte, C. & C. Baied. 2011, Recursos líticos, aprovisionamiento y aspectos temporales de fuentes de abastecimiento en Amaicha del Valle, Tucumán, Argentina. Comenchingonia, 14: 97-113. (in Spanish) (“Lithic resources, procurement and temporal aspects of sourcing in Amaicha del Valle, Tucumán, Argentina”). URL: http://www.comechingonia.com/COMECHINGONIA%20IMPRESA/comechingonia_N14.htm
Somonte, C. & C. Baied. 2013, Edad mínima de exposición de superficies en canteras-taller: reflexiones en torno a las primeras dataciones mediante microlaminaciones del barniz de las rocas (VML) para el noroeste argentino. Chungara, 45 (3): 427-445. (in Spanish) (“Minimum surface exposure age of stone quarry - workshops: insights on the first rock-varnish microlamination (vml) dates for northewestern Argentina”). doi:10.4067/S0717-73562013000300005
Valverde, Federico 2003, Análisis de los desechos líticos de la ocupación inicial del sitio cueva Tixi (Provincia de Buenos Aires): cadena operativa de producción y técnicas de talla tempranas. Relaciones de la Sociedad Argentina de Antropología, 28: 185-202. (in Spanish) (“Analysis of lithic debris from the initial occupation of the cave site Tixi (Buenos Aires): operational chain of production and early carving techniques. URL: http://www.saantropologia.com.ar//wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Relaciones%2028/28%20Valverde.pdf
Published
21-Dec-2015
How to Cite
Carbonelli, J. (2015). Aporte del análisis de colecciones a las modalidades de aprovisionamiento: El caso de los sitios cantera-taller del Valle de Yocavil (Noroeste Argentino) [Contribution to the analysis of collection procurement mechanisms]. Journal of Lithic Studies, 2(2), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v2i2.1195
Section
Research Articles