Vol. 1 (2016)

Articles

• Preface

  Patrick Honeybone, Julian Bradfield, Josef Fruehwald, Pavel Iosad, Benjamin Molineaux, Michael Ramsammy

  1-4

  • PDF

• Examining the life cycle of phonological processes: considerations for historical research

  Ranjan Sen

  5-36

  • PDF

• Historical phonology and morphology in the nineteenth century: abstractness vs. empiricism

  András Cser

  37-49

  • PDF

• Diachronic dynamics of Middle English phonotactics provide evidence for analogy effects among lexical and morphonotactic consonant clusters

  Andreas Baumann, Nikolaus Ritt, Christina Prömer

  50-75

  • PDF

• Tone loss in Sranan Creole: re-thinking contact driven change

  Emily Barth

  76-89

  • PDF

• Towards a definition of an Egyptian Greek variety

  Sonja Dahlgren

  90-108

  • PDF

• The typology of the distribution of Edge: the propensity for bipositionality

  Shanti Ulfsbjorninn, Mohamed Lahrouchi

  109-129

  • PDF

• Synchronic stratum-specific rates of application reflect diachronic change:
 morphosyntactic conditioning of variation in English /l/-darkening

  Danielle Turton

  130-165

  • PDF

• Sociolinguistic motivations in sound change: on-going loss of low tone breathy voice in Shanghai Chinese

  Jiayin Gao

  166-186

  • PDF

• Tracing L-vocalisation in early Scots

  Benjamin Molineaux, Joanna Kopaczyk, Warren Maguire, Rhona Alcorn, Vasilios Karaiskos, Bettelou Los

  187-217

  • PDF

• Rule scattering and vowel length in Northern Romance

  Pavel Iosad

  218-237

  • PDF

• System complexity and (im)possible sound changes

  Klaas Seinhorst

  238-249

  • PDF

• The emergence of the concept of 'morphologically conditioned sound changes'

  Marc Pierce

  250-268

  • PDF

• The origins of Japanese h from an element-based perspective

  Phillip Backley, Kuniya Nasukawa

  269-284

  • PDF

• From phonetic enhancement to phonological underspecification: hybrid voicing contrast in European Portuguese

  Michael Ramsammy, Patrycja Strycharczuk

  285-315

  • PDF

• Are there impossible changes? θ > f but f ≯ θ

  Patrick Honeybone

  316-358

  • PDF

• Dissimilation can be gradient: evidence from Aberystwyth English

  Adèle Jatteau, Michaela Hejná

  359-386

  • PDF