The Piney Branch site (District of Columbia, U.S.A.) and the significance of the quarry-refuse model for the interpretation of lithics sites
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.2986Keywords:
paleoliths, Progressive Series, quarry-refuse model, roughly-flaked bifacial artefacts, lithics sitesAbstract
In the 1870s the amateur archaeologist Dr Charles Abbott discovered roughly-flaked bifacial artefacts that he called “paleoliths” near Trenton, New Jersey, which he claimed were artefact types similar to Lower Palaeolithic handaxes being found in western Europe at that time. This interpretation gave rise to what has been called the Great Palaeolithic War, a debate in the United States about the existence of an “American Palaeolithic” that only ended in 1890 when the archaeologist William H. Holmes from the Smithsonian Institution excavated the Piney Branch lithics site in Washington D.C.. On the basis of the bifacial reduction sequence that he reconstructed from the lithics excavated at Piney Branch, Holmes argued that any resemblance of paleoliths to Lower Palaeolithic handaxes was accidental. Holmes believed that paleoliths were discarded elements from the sequential reduction of stone nodules (which he called the “Progressive Series”) by recent American Indian knappers during the manufacture of projectile points. In other words, the Trenton paleoliths, and by implication similar roughly-flaked bifaces, were nothing more than quarry refuse (or “waste”). Since Holmes’ day the quarry-refuse model for the interpretation of large roughly-flaked bifacial implements as “waste” and not artefact types used in other activities, particularly for lithics sties in the arid western regions of the US, has been applied at times without adequate bridging arguments. A review of Holmes’ interpretation of the Piney Branch evidence suggests that his quarry-refuse model, even when applied to Piney Branch, required numerous untested assumptions, and that the model may inadvertently obscure a range of other prehistoric activities not strictly related to quarrying and knapping. As a consequence, the application of the quarry-refuse model today to lithics sites found in North America without careful examination may also fail to identify the complete range of cultural activity at those sites, and should be applied to lithics sites only with due caution and the testing of alternative hypotheses.
References
Abbott, C.C. 1878, Second report on the Paleolithic implements from the glacial drift, in the valley of the Delaware River, near Trenton, N. J. In: Annual Report of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology. Salem Press, Salem Massachusetts: p. 225-257.
Abbott, C.C. 1881, Primitive Industry: Or Illustrations of the Handiwork, in Stone, Bone and Clay, of the Native Races of the Northern Atlantic Seaboard of America. George A. Bates, Salem Massachusetts, 560 p. doi:10.1038/025027a0
Adovasio, J.M. & Page, J. 2003, The First Americans: In Pursuit of Archaeology’s Greatest Mystery. Modern Library, New York, 352 p.
Bailey, G. & Galanidou, N. 2009, Caves, palimpsests and dwelling spaces: examples from the Upper Palaeolithic of south-east Europe. World Archaeology, 41: 215-241. doi:10.1080/00438240902843733.
Bamforth, D. & Dorn, R. 1988. On the Nature and Antiquity of the Manix Lake Industry. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 10(2): 209-226. URL: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub/24
Bloxam, E. & Heldal, T. 2008, Identifying heritage values and character-defining elements of ancient quarry landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean: an integrated analysis. Work Package, 8. URL: http://www.quarryscapes.no
Brumbach, H. J.,1987, A quarry/workshop and processing station on the Hudson River in Pleasantdale, New York. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 15: 59-83. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40914355
Bryan, K. 1950, Flint Quarries - The Sources of Tools and, At the Same Time, The Factories of the American Indian. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology Volume XVII, Number 3. Peabody Museum, Cambridge Massachusetts, 40 p.
Callahan, E., 1979, The basics of biface knapping in the eastern fluted point tradition. A manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America, 7(1): 1-180. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40914177
Callahan, E. 1991, Out of theory and into reality: A comment on Nami’s comment. Plains Anthropologist, 36(137): 367-368. doi:10.1080/2052546.1991.11909644
Debénath, A. & Dibble, H.L. 1994, Handbook of Paleolithic Typology: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe. University of Pennsylvania Museum, Philadelphia, 202 p. doi:10.9783/9781934536803
Evans, J. 1872, The Ancient Stone Implements, Weapons, and Ornaments, of Great Britain. Longmans, Green, Reader, & Dyer, London, 640 p. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316155455
Fotiadis, M. 2016, Leaf-points from Petrota (Greek Thrace) and the Palaeolithic chronology of the Vrahos chert quarry. Annual of the British School at Athens, 111: 1-11. doi:10.1017/s0068245416000046
Glennan, W. 1976, The Manix Lake industry: Early lithic tradition or workshop refuse? Journal of New World Archaeology, 1: 43-62.
Holmes, W.H. 1890, A quarry workshop of the flaked-stone implement makers in the District of Columbia. American Anthropologist, 3: 1-26. doi:10.1525/aa.1890.3.1.02a00020
Holmes, W.H. 1892, Modern quarry refuse and the Palaeolithic theory. Science, 20: 295-297. doi:10.1126/science.ns-20.512.295
Holmes, W.H. 1893a, Gravel man and Palaeolithic culture; a preliminary word. Science, 21: 29-30. doi:10.1126/science.ns-21.520.29
Holmes, W.H. 1893b, Are there traces of man in the Trenton Gravels. Journal of Geology, 1: 15-37. doi:10.1086/606134
Holmes, W.H. 1897, Stone implements of the Potomac-Chesapeake tidewater province. In: Fifteenth Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology for 1893-1894 (J. W. Powell, Ed.). Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.: p. 13-152. URL: https://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/annualreportofbu1518931894smit
Knell, E.J. 2014, Terminal Pleistocene-Early Holocene Lithic Technological Organization Around Lake Mojave, California. Journal of Field Archaeology, 39: 213-229. doi:10.1179/0093469014z.00000000087
Knell, E.J., Walden-Hurtgen, L. & Kirby, M. 2014, Terminal Pleistocene-Early Holocene spatio-temporal and settlement patterns around Pluvial Lake Mojave, California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 34(1): 43-57. doi:10.1179/0093469014z.00000000087
Malinsky-Buller, A., Hovers, E. & Marder, O. 2011, Making time: ‘living floors’, ‘palimpsests’ and site formation processes-a perspective from the open-air Lower Paleolithic site of Revadim Quarry, Israel. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 30: 89-101. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.11.002
McFadden, L.D. 2013, Strongly dust-influenced soils and what they tell us about landscape dynamics in vegetated aridlands of the Southwestern United States. In: The Web of Geological Sciences: Advances, Impacts, and Interactions. (M. E. Bickford, Ed.), Geological Society of America Special Paper 500. Geological Society of America, Boulder: p. 501-532. doi:10.1130/2013.2500(15).
McFadden, L.D. 2017, Soils of desert landscapes. In: International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology (Richardson, D. Ed.). Wiley Blackwell, New York: p. 1-19. doi:10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0880
McFadden, L.D., McDonald, E.V., Wells, S.G., Anderson, K.J. Quade, & Forman, S.L. 1998, The vesicular layer and carbonate collars of desert soils and pavements: Formation, age and relation to climate change. Geomorphology, 24: 101-145. doi:10.1016/s0169-555x(97)00095-0
Meltzer, D.J. 2009, First Peoples in a New World: Colonizing Ice Age America. University of California, Berkeley, 446 p.
Meltzer, D.J. 2015, The Great Paleolithic War: How Science Forged an Understanding of America’s Ice Age Past. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 690 p. doi:9780226293363.001.0001
Meltzer, D.J. & Dunnell, R.C., (Eds.), 1992, The Archaeology of William Henry Holmes. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 397 p.
Shea, J.J. 2013, Stone Tools in the Palaeolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 422 p. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139026314
Shott, M.J. 2003, Chaîne opératoire and reduction sequence. Lithic Technology, 28(2): 95-105. doi:10.1080/01977261.2003.11721005
Shott, M.J. 2017, Stage and continuum approaches in prehistoric biface production: A North American perspective. PLoS One, 12(3): e0170947. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170947
Skarpelis, N., Carter, T., D.A., Contreras, D.A. & Mihailovic, D.D. 2017, Characterization of the siliceous rocks at Stélida, an early prehistoric lithic quarry (Northwest Naxos, Greece), by petrography and geochemistry: a first step towards chert sourcing. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 12: 819-833. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.11.015
Volk, E. 1911, The Archaeology of the Delaware Valley. Peabody Museum, Cambridge Massachusetts, 258 p.
Wilmsen, E.N. 1965, An outline of early man studies in the United States. American Antiquity, 31: 172-192. doi:10.2307/2693983
Whittaker, J.C. 1994, Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools. University of Texas Press, Austin, 341 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This is an Open Access journal. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated.
Please read our Open Access, Copyright and Permissions policies for more information.
