Lithic assemblages of Azokh Cave (Nagorno Karabagh, Lesser Caucasus): Raw materials, technology and regional context

  • Lena Asryan Àrea de Prehistòria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV). Avinguda de Catalunya 35, 43002 Tarragona
  • Andreu Ollé IPHES, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social. C/Marcel.lí Domingo s/n (Edifici W3), Campus Sescelades, 43007, Tarragona
  • Norah Moloney University College London, Institute of Archaeology, 31-34 Gordon Square, WH1E OPY, London
  • Tania King Blandford Town Museum. Bere's Yard, Blandford, Dorset
Keywords: Azokh Cave, Middle to Upper Pleistocene, lithic artefacts, raw materials

Abstract


Azokh Cave is a Middle Pleistocene to Holocene site located in Nagorno Karabagh (Lesser Caucasus). The main entrance, Azokh 1, is a large cave that has two geological sequences (lower and upper) with nine geo-archaeological units of which only the upper ones (Units I to V) have a significant archaeological record.  The faunal remains and lithic artefacts in these units indicate aspects of human occupation, and exploitation of, and association with animals.

     The lithic artefacts presented here were recovered from Units V, III and II during the 2002 – 2009 excavation seasons. The available chronological data indicates an age between 293 – 100 Ka for these units. The operational chain is incomplete and artefacts found in the cave are primarily end-products dominated by flake-tools. The assemblage of Unit V is composed primarily of simple, unretouched flakes with a minimal presence of retouched flakes and cores. The Unit II lithic assemblage includes a substantial Levallois component, although with fewer cores and retouched flakes. There are very few flake tools in Unit III. While it is still difficult to assign the Unit V assemblage to a techno-typological group or complex (i.e. Acheulean, Mousterian or other local techno-complexes such as the Kudarian), the Unit II assemblage is clearly associated with Mode 3 or the Mousterian techno-complex.

Different local and non-local raw materials were exploited in all units for the production of lithic artefacts, although the range of raw materials is more varied in Unit II. Local chert, flint and basalt were used most commonly, probably due to their easy accessibility. Limestone, jasper and sandstone, from local and non-local sources, are present in small quantities in Units V and II. Obsidian is the only raw material that possibly originates from more distant sources. Flint and chert appear to have been preferentially exploited for flake tool production in all units, but the toolmakers show a preference for better quality raw material (flint, basalt, obsidian) for retouched pieces in Units V and II, and for Levallois production in Unit II.

References

Adler, D.S., Yeritsyan, B., Wilkinson, K., Pinhasi, R., Bar-Oz, G., Nahapetyan, S., Mallol, C., Berna, F., Bailey, R., Beverly, A., Glauberman, Ph., Wales, N. & Gasparyan, B. 2012, The Hrazdan Gorge Palaeolithic project, 2008 – 2009. In: Archaeology of Armenia in regional context Proceedings of the International Conference dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of the Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography 15-17 September, 2009 Yerevan (Avetisyan, P. & Bobokhyan, A., Eds.), GITUTYUN, Yerevan: p. 7-22.

Adler, D., Bar-Oz, G., Belfer-Cohen, A., Bar-Yosef, O. 2006, Ahead of the game – Middle and Upper Palaeolithic hunting behaviours in the Southern Caucasus. Current Anthropology, 47: 89-118.

Adler, D.S. & Tushabramishvili, N. 2004, Middle Palaeolithic patterns of settlement and subsistence in the Southern Caucasus. In: Middle Palaeolithic Settlement Dynamics, (Conard, N., Ed.), Kerns Verlag, Tübingen: p. 91–132.

Allué, E. (in press), Charcoal remains from Azokh 1: Preliminary results. In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor, Chapter 15, (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T., & Yepiskoposyan, L., Eds..), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer, Dordrecht.

Asryan, L., Moloney, N. & Ollé, A. (in press), Lithic assemblages recovered in Azokh 1. In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor, Chapter 4, (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T & Yepiskoposyan, L., Eds.), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer, Dordrecht.

Baena, J., Carrión, E., Requejo, V. 2003, Recent Discoveries of discoid industries in Western Cantabria (North Spain). In: Discoid Lithic Technology. Advances and Implications, (Peresani, M., Ed.), B.A.R. International Series Vol. 1120, Aechaeopress, Oxford: p. 117-126.

Barge, O. & Chataigner, C. 2003, The procurement of obsidian: factors influencing the choice of deposits, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 323: 172-179. doi:10.1016/S0022 3093(03)00301-6

Bar-Oz, G., Weissbrod, L., Gasparian, B., Nahapetyan, S., Wilkinson, K. & Pinhasi, R. 2012, Taphonomy and zooarchaeology of a high-altitude Upper Pleistocene faunal sequence from Hovq-1 Cave, Armenia, Journal of Archaeological Science, 39: 2452-2463. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.014

Binford, L.R. 1979, Organization and formation processes: Looking at curated technologies, Journal of Anthropological Research, 35 (3): 255-273. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629902

Blackman, J., Badaljan, R., Kikodze, Z., Kohl, Ph. 1998, Chemical characterization of Caucasian obsidian geological sources. In: L’obsidienne au Proche et Moyen Orient. Duvolcan à l’outil, (Cauvin, M-C., Gourgaud, A., Gratuze, B., Arnaud, N., Poupeau, G., Poidevin, J-L. & Chataigner, C., Eds.), B.A.R. International Series Vol. 738, Archaeopress, Oxford: p. 206-231.

Boëda, E. 2005, Paléo-Technologie ou anthropologie des techniques? Arob@se, 1: 46-64. (in French) (“Paleo-technology or the antrhopology of techniques?”)

Boëda, E. 1994, Le concept Levallois: variabilité des méthodes, Monographie du CRA, 9, CNRS Editions, Paris, 280 p. (in French) (“The Levallois concept: variability of methods”)

Bordes, F. 1961, Typologie de Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen Publications de l'Institut de Préhistoire de l'Université de Bordeaux. Mémoire No. 1. Delmas, Bordeaux. 108p. (in French) (“Typology of the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic”)

Carbonell, E., Mosquera, M., Ollé, A., Rodríguez, X.P., Sala, R., Vaquero, M., Vergés, J.M. 1992, New elements of the Logical Analytic System, Cahier Noir, 6: 5-61.

Carbonell, E. & Rodríguez, X.P. 1994, Early Middle Pleistocene deposits and artifacts in the Gran Dolina site (TD-4) of the Sierra de Atapuerca (Burgos, Spain), Journal of Human Evolution, 26: 291-311. doi:10.1006/jhev.1994.1018

Clark D.J. 2001, The Stone Age cultural sequence: terminology, typology and raw material. In: Kalambo Falls Prehistoric site, 3. The Middle and Earlier Stone Age, (Clark, J.D., Ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 35-65.

Djafarov, A. 1999, Средний Палеолит Азербайджана, Elm, Baku, 345 p. (in Russian) (“Middle Palaeolithic of Azerbaijan”)

Djafarov, A. 1983, Мустьерская культура Азербайджана (по материалам Тагларской пещеры), Elm, Baku: 228p. (in Russian) (“The Mousterian Culture of Azerbaijan (based on the material of Taglar Cave”)

Doronichev, V.B. 2008, The Lower Palaeolithic in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus: a reappraisal of the data and new approaches, PaleoAnthropology, 2008: 107-157.

Doronichev, V.B. 2001, Первоначальное заселение в Восточной Европы, Донская археология, 3-4(12-13): 6-23. (in Russian) (“Initial Occupation in Eastern Europe”)

Doronichev, V., Golovanova, L., Baryshnikov, G., Blackwell, B., Garutt, N., Levkovskaya, G., Molodkov, A., Nesemyanov, S., Pospelova, G., Hoffecker, J. 2007, Пещера Треугольная: Ранний Палеолит на Ковказе и в Восточной Европе. Ostrowityanian, St. Petersburg, 270 p. (in Russian) (“Treugol’naya Cave: The Early Palaeolithic in the Caucasus and Eastern Europe”)

Doronichev, V., Blackwell, B., Golovanova, L., Levkovskaya, G., Pospelova, G. 2004, Treugol’naya Cave in the Northern Caucasus, Russia: its chronology, paleoenvironments, industries, and relationship to the Lower Palaeolithic in Eastern Europe, Eurasian Prehistory, 2: 77-100.

Eritsian, B. 1981, Новая нижнепалеолитическая пещерная стоянка Лусакерт 1 (Aрмения), Kratkie soobsheniya institute archeologii, Yerevan, 141 p. (in Russian) (“A new Lower Palaeolithic cave site of Lusakert I (Armenia)”)

Féblot-Augustins, J. 1999, Raw material transport patterns and settlement system in the European Lower and Middle Palaeolithic: continuity and variability. In: Chapter 10: The Middle Palaeolithic Occupations of Europe, (Roebroeks, W. and Gamble, C., Eds.), University of Leiden, Leiden: p. 193 - 214.

Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Ditchfield, P., Grün, R., Lees, W., Aubert, M., Torres, T., Ortiz, J.E., Díaz Bautista, A. and Pickering, R. (in press). Dating methods applied to Azokh Cave sites (Annex). In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor, (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T., & Yepiskoposyan, L., eds.), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer: Dordrecht.

Fernández-Jalvo, Y.; King, T.; Andrews, P., Yepiskoposyan, L., Moloney, N.; Murray, J.; Domínguez-Alonso, P.; Asryan, L.; Ditchfield,P.; van der Made, J.; Torres, T.; Sevilla, P.; Nieto Díaz, M.; Cáceres, I.; Allué, E.; Marín Monfort, M.D.; Sanz Martín, T. 2010, The Azokh Cave complex: Middle Pleistocene to Holocene human occupation in the Caucasus, Journal of Human Evolution, 58: 103-109. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.07.005

Gabunia, L., Antón, S., Lordkipanidze, D., Vekua, Justus, A. & Swisher C.C.III. 2001, Dmanisi and dispersal, Evolutionary Anthropology, 10: 158-170. doi:10.1002/evan.1030

Geneste, J.M. 1985, Analyse d’industries moustériennes du Périgord: une approche technologique du comportement des groupes humains au Paléolithique Moyen, PhD thesis, Université de Bordeaux I, Bordeaux. (in French) ("Analysis of Middle Palaeolithic industries of Périgord : a technological approach to the behaviour of human groups in the Middle Palaeolithic")

Golovanova, L., Doronichev, V., Cleghorn, N., Koulkova, M., Sapelko, T., Shackley, M. 2010, Significance of ecological factors in the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic Transition, Current Anthropology, 51: 655-691. doi:10.1086/656185

Golovanova, L. & Doronichev, V. 2003, The Middle Palaeolithic of the Caucasus, Journal of World Prehistory, 17: 71-140. doi:0892-7537/03/0300-0071/0

Golovanova, L., Hoffecker, J., Kharitonov, V., Romanova G. 1999, Mezmaiskaya Cave: A Neanderthal occupation in the Northern Caucasus, Current Anthropology, 40: 77-86. doi:10.1086/515805

Ghukasyan, R., Colonge, D., Nahapetyan, S., Ollivier, V., Gasparyan, B., Monchot, H. & Chatainger, Ch. 2011, Kalavan-2 (North of Lake Sevan, Armenia): A New Late Middle Palaeolithic site in the Lesser Caucasus, Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia, 38: 39-51.

Guseinov, M.M. 1985, Древний Палеолит Азербайджана, Elm, Baku: 96 p. (in Russian) (“Lower Palaeolithic of Azerbaijan”)

Kasimova, R.M. 2001. Anthropological research of Azykh Man osseous remains. Human Evolution, 16: 37-44. doi:10.1007/BF02438921

Kasimova, R.M. 1986, Первая находка самого древнего пешерного человека на территории СССР, Elm, Baku: 68 p. (in Russian) (“The first discovery of remains of the oldest cave hominin in the territory of USSR”)

King, T., Compton, T., Rosas, A., Andrews, P. Yepiskoposyan, L., and Asryan, L. (in press), Azokh Cave Hominin Remains. In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor Chapter 5 (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T., & Yepiskoposyan, L., Eds.), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer: Dordrecht.

Laplace, G. 1972, La Typologie Analytique et Structurale: Base Rationnelle d'Étude des Industries Lithiques et Osseuses, Banques des données archéologiques. Colloques nationaux du CNRS, 932: 91-143. (in French) (“Analytical and Structural Typology: Rational Basis for the Study of Lithic and Faunal Industries”)

Lioubine, V.P. 2002, L’Acheuléen du Caucase, Études et Recherches Archéologiques de l’Université de Liège, ERAUL Vol. 93, Liège: 140 p. (in Fench) (“The Acheulean of the Caucasus”)

Liubin, V.P. 1977, Мустьерские культуры Кавказа, Nauka, Leningrad, 223 p. (in Russian) (“Mousterian Cultures of the Caucasus”)

van der Made, J., Torres, T., Ortiz, J.E., Moreno-Pérez, L. and Fernández-Jalvo, Y. (in press), The new material of large mammals from Azokh and comments on the older collections. In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor, Chapter 6 (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T., & Yepiskoposyan, L., Eds.), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer: Dordrecht

Marín-Monfort, M.D., Cáceres, I., Andrews, P. and Fernández-Jalvo, Y. (in press), Taphonomy and site formation of Azokh 1. In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor, Chapter 10 (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T., & Yepiskoposyan, L., Eds.), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer, Dordrecht.

Meignen, L.&Tushabramishvili, N. 2006, Paléolithique Moyen laminaire sure les flancs sud du Caucase: production lithiques et fonctionnement du site de Djruchula (Georgie), Paléorient, 32(2): 81-104. (in French) (“Laminar Middle Palaeolithic on the southern flanks of the Caucasus: lithic production and function at the site of Djruchula (Georgia)”)

Mourre, V. 2003. Discoïde ou pas Discoïde? Réflexions sur la pertinence des critères techniques définissant le débitage discoïde, In: Discoid Lithic Technology. Advances and Implications. (Peresani M., Ed.). B.A.R International Series Vol. 1120, Archaeopress, Oxford: p. 54-72. (in Fench) (“Discoidal or non-discoidal? Reflections on the relevance of technical criteria defining discoidal debitage”)

Murray, J., Lynch, E.P., Domínguez-Alonso, P. & Barham, M. (in press), Stratigraphy and Sedimentology of Azokh Caves, In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor, Chapter 2, (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T., & Yepiskoposyan, L., Eds.), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer, Dordrecht.

Murray, J., Domínguez-Alonso, P., Fernández-Jalvo, Y., King, T., Lynch, E.P., Andrews, P., Yepiskoposyan, L., Moloney, N., Cacères, I., Allué, E., Asryan, L., Ditchfield, P. & Williams, D.M. 2010, Pleistocene to Holocene stratigraphy of Azokh 1 Cave, Lesser Caucasus. Irish Journal of Earth Science, 28: 75-91. doi:10.3318/IJES.2010.28.75

van Peer, P. 1995, Current Issues in the Levallois Problem, In: The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology, (Dibble, H. and Bar-Yosef, O., Eds.), Monographs in World Archaeology Vol. 23, Madison, Wisconsin: p. 1-9.

van Peer, P. 1992, The Levallois Reduction Strategy, Monographs in World Archaeology, Madison, Wisconsin, 137 p.

Pinhasi, R., Gasparian, B., Nahapetyan, S., Bar-Oz, G., Weissbrod, L., Bruch, A., Hovsepyan, R., Wilkinson, K. 2011, Middle Palaeolithic human occupation of the high altitude region of Hovq – 1, Armenia, Quaternary Science Reviews, 30: 3846 – 3857. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.09.020

Pinhasi, R., Gasparian, B., Wilkinson, K., Bailey, R., Bar-Oz, G., Bruch, A., Chataigner, C., Hoffmann, D., Hovsepyan, R., Nahapetyan, S., Pike, A., Schreve, D., Stephens, M. 2008, Hovq 1 and the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of Armenia: a preliminary framework, Journal of Human Evolution, 55: 803-816. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.04.005

Rensink, E., Kolen, J., & Spieksma, A. 1991, Patterns of raw materials distribution in the Upper Pleistocene of Northern and Central Europe, In: Raw Material Economies among Prehistoric Hunter-Gathers (Montet-White, A. and Holen, S., Eds.), Publications in Anthropology Vol. 19, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas: p. 141-159.

Rodríguez, X.P. 2004, Technical systems of lithic production in the Lower and Middle Pleistocene of the Iberian Peninsula. Technological variability between North-Eastern sites and Sierra de Atapuerca sites, B.A.R. International Series Vol. 1323. Archaeopress, Oxford: 184 p.

Roebroeks,W. & Tuffreau, A. 1999, Palaeoenvironment and settlement patterns of the Northwest European Palaeolithic. In: The Middle Palaeolithic Occupations of Europe, (Roebroeks, W. and Gamble, C., Eds.), University of Leiden, Leiden: p. 121 - 138.

Sevilla, P. (in press), Bats from Azokh 1 Cave, preliminary results, In: Azokh Cave and the Transcaucasian Corridor, Chapter 8, (Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Andrews, P., King, T., & Yepiskoposyan, L., Eds.), Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Book Series. Springer, Dordrecht.

Terrades, X. 2003, Discoid Flaking Method: Conception and Technological Variability. In: Discoid Lithic Technology. Advances and Implications, (Peresani, M., Ed.), B.A.R International Series Vol. 1120. Archaeopress, Oxford: p. 1-14.

Vaquero, M. & Carbonell, E. 2003, A temporal perspective on the variability of the discoid method in the Iberian Peninsula. In: Discoid Lithic Technology. Advances and implications, (Peresani, M., Ed.), B.A.R. International Series Vol. 1120, Archaeopress, Oxford: p. 67-81.
Published
15-Mar-2014
How to Cite
Asryan, L., Ollé, A., Moloney, N., & King, T. (2014). Lithic assemblages of Azokh Cave (Nagorno Karabagh, Lesser Caucasus): Raw materials, technology and regional context. Journal of Lithic Studies, 1(1), 33-54. https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v1i1.775
Section
Research Articles