Therapists Have a lot to Add to the Field of Research, but Many Don’t Make it There: A Narrative Thematic Inquiry into Counsellors’ and Psychotherapists’ Embodied Engagement with Research


  • Sofie Bager-Charleson, Dr Metanoia Institute London
  • Simon Du Plock, Professor Metanoia Institute London
  • Alistair McBeath, Dr Metanoia Institute London



Research frequently addresses a gap between practice and research in the field of psychotherapy. Castonguay et al (2010) suggest that the practice of many full-time psychotherapists is rarely or nonsubstantially influenced by research. Boisvert and Faust (2005) ask ‘why do psychotherapists not rely on the research to consistently inform their practice?’ and suggest that concerns ‘have echoed through the decades’ about psychotherapists’ failings to integrate of research and practice. This study focuses on therapists’ (counsellors and psychotherapists) reasoning about their engagement with ‘research’ as described in dissertations and in personal, anonymously presented documents, research journals and interviews included. The study focuses on the stages which generally are referred to as ‘data analysis’, which in this study refers research stages where interpretation typically is required with synthesising and analysing in mind. Turning our attention to the therapists’ ‘narrative knowing’ about research during these stages where generating own new knowledge is put to the forefront, have highlighted a complex relationship involving epistemological discrepancies, real or imagined, between practice and research. It also highlighted gender issues, culture and commonly held constructs about what constitutes a ‘counsellor’, which we believe influence therapists’ presence in research. We decided to include the citation “Therapists have a lot to add to the field of research, but many don’t make it there” in the title to illustrate some of the complexity. The study is based on a Professional Doctorate programme, which engages with psychologists, counsellors and psychotherapists in practice-based research. In addition to drawing from dissertations already in the public domain students and graduates from the doctoral programme were invited to contribute their own embodied experiences from ‘doing’ a data analysis. The paper suggests a hybrid for narrative analysis, discussing the options to (re-)present narratives guided by a combined interest into the unique, personal whilst also looking for ‘themes’ within and across these narratives.


Adams, M. (2014). The myth of the untroubled therapists. London, UK: Routledge
Anderson, R., & Braud, W. (2011). Transforming self and others through research. New York, NY: Suny.
Bager-Charleson, S. (2012). Personal development in counselling and psychotherapy. London, UK: Sage & Learning Matters.
Bager-Charleson, S., & Kasap, Z. (2017a). Embodied situatedness and emotional entanglement in research. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17, 190-200.
Bager-Charleson, S. (2017b). Countertransference in research: An intersubjective reflexive approach. In P. Valerio (Ed.), Introduction to Countertransference in Therapeutic Practice: A Myriad of Mirrors (pp. 167-185). London: Routledge.
Bager-Charleson, S. (2004). Parents’ school? Narrative research about parental involvement in school. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur. Retrieved from
Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (1994) Qualitative methods in psychology. A research guide. Buckingham, UK: OU Press.
Bamberg, M. G. W. (2010). Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Volume 3 (pp. 77-93). Washington, DC: APA Press.
Bamberg, M. G. W. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal or Narrative and Life history, 7, 333-342.
Boisvert C. M., & Faust D. (2006). Practicing psychologists' knowledge of general psychotherapy research findings: Implications for science-practice relations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 708-716.
Boden, Z., Gibson, S., Owen, G.J., & Benson, O. (2016). Feelings and intersubjectivity in qualitative suicide research. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1078-1090.
Bondi, L., & Fewell, J. (2016). Practitioner research in counselling and psychotherapy. The power of examples. London, UK: Macmillan Palgrave.
Bondi, L. (2013). Research and therapy generating meaning and feeling gaps. Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 9-19.
Chase, S. E. (2005) Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Voices. In N. K Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 651-679). London: Sage.
Castonguay, L. G., Nelson, D. L., Boutselis, M. A., Chiswick, N. R., Damer, D. D., Hemmelstein, N. A., Jackson, J. S., Morford, M., Ragusea, S. A., GowenRoper, J., Spayd, C., Weiszer, T., & Borkovec, T. D. (2010). Psychotherapists, researchers, or both? A Qualitative Analysis of Experiences in a Practice Research Network, 47, 345-354.
Clarke, S., & Hodgett, P. (Eds.) (2009). Researching beneath the surface: Psycho-social research methods in practice. London, UK: Karnac.
Denzin, N. K. (2009). On understanding emotion. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Du Plock, S. (2018, in press) (Ed.). Case studies in existential therapy: Translating theory into practice. London, UK: PCCS Books.
du Plock, S. (2016). Where am I with my research, Harnessing reflexivity for practice-based quality inquiry. UKCP: The Psychotherapist, 62, 16-18.
du Plock, S. (2015). Bibliotherapy and beyond: Research as a catalyst for change in therapeutic practice. In S. P. Goss, & C. Stevens (Eds.), Making research matter. Researching for change in the theory and practice of counselling and psychotherapy (pp. 85-106). London, UK: Routledge.
Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher. London, UK: Jessica Kinglsey.
Ellington, L. (2017). Embodiment in qualitative research. New York, NY: Routledge
Finlay, L. (2016). Being a therapist-researcher: doing relational-reflexive research. UKCP: The Psychotherapist, 62, 4-5.
Finlay, L., & Evans, K. (2009). Relational-centred research for psychotherapists: Exploring meanings and experience. London, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Finlay, L. (2006). The body’s disclosure in phenomenological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 19-30.
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2003). Reflexivity–a practical guide. London: Blackwell.
Freeman, M. (2017). Modes of thinking for qualitative data analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gendlin, E. T. (1997). A process model. New York: The Focusing Institute.
Gendlin, E. T. (2009). What first and third person processes really are. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16, 332-362.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575-599.
Hollway, W. (2011). In between external and internal worlds: Imagination in Transitional Space. UK Methodological Innovations Online, 6, 50-60. Retrieved from
Hollway, W. (2016). Emotional experience plus reflection: countertransference and reflexivity in research. The creative use of self in research Explorations of reflexivity and research relationships in psychotherapy. UKCP: The Psychotherapist , 62, 19-21.
Hollway, W. (2009). Applying the ‘experience-near’ principle to research: Psychoanalytically informed methods. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23, 461-474.
Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently. London, UK: Sage.

Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2014). Introduction to research methods in psychotherapy. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Jeffrey Pause, C., Powell, K., Waitere, H., Wright, K., & Gilling, M. (2012). We say what we are and we do what we say: feminisms in educational practice in Aotearoa. New Zealand Feminist Review, 102, 79-96.
Josselson, R. (2016). Reflexivity and ethics in qualitative research. UKCP: The Psychotherapist Journal, 62, 22-25.
Josselson, R. (2013). Interviewing for qualitative inquiry. A relational approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press
Josselson, R. (2011). Bet you think this song is about you: Whose narrative is it in narrative research? Narrative Works: Issues, Investigations, & Interventions, 1, 33-51.
Josselson, R. (1996). On writing other people's lives: self-analytic reflections of a narrative researcher. In R. Josselson (Ed.), Ethics and process in the narrative study of lives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100-122.
McBeath, A. G. (2018, in press). The motivations of psychotherapists. CPR, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, Guest edited issue.
McGinley, P. (2015). A phenomenological exploration of crying. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Regent’s School of Psychotherapy and Psychology. Regent’s University London.
Neuhaus, E. C. (2011). Becoming a CBT therapists: striving to integrate professional and personal development. In R. Klein, H. S. Bernard & V. Schermer (Eds.), On becoming a psychotherapist: The personal and professional journey (pp. 218-245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Orange, D. M. (1996). Emotional understanding: Studies In psychoanalytic epistemology. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
Orange, D. M. (2009). Thinking for cinicians: Philosophical resources for contemporary psychoanalysis and the humanistic psychotherapies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Polkinghorne, D. P (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. New York: NY: Suny Press.
Polkinghorne, D. (1991). Narrative and self-concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 2, 135-153.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Riessman, C. K. (2002) Analysis of personal experiences. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interviewing (pp. 695-711). London, UK: Sage.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. London, UK: Sage.
Rennie, D. L., & Fergus, K. D. (2006). Embodied categorizing in the grounded theory method. Theory and Psychology, 16, 483-503.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London, UK: Zed Books.
Spry, T. (2001). Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 706-732.
Tordes, L. (2007). Embodied enquiry. Phenomenological touchstones for research, psychotherapy and spirituality. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York, NY: W. W. Norton
Willig, C. (2012). Qualitative interpretation and analysis in psychology. Maidenhead, UK: OU Press.




How to Cite

Bager-Charleson, S., Du Plock, S., & McBeath, A. (2018). Therapists Have a lot to Add to the Field of Research, but Many Don’t Make it There: A Narrative Thematic Inquiry into Counsellors’ and Psychotherapists’ Embodied Engagement with Research. Language and Psychoanalysis, 7(1), 4–22.



Original Articles