The Handbook of Conversation Analysis & Emotion in Interaction.

Michael B. Buchholz

doi:10.7565/landp.2013.003

Authors

Michael B. Buchholz International Psychoanalytic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7565/landp.2013.003

Abstract

Reviewing Conversation Analysis (CA) “at the Century’s Turn”, Emanuel A. Schegloff predicted the “further development of our understanding of the organization of talk and other conduct in interaction itself” and to “register the particularities of its realization” (Schegloff 1999, p. 142). John Heritage (1999), additionally, foresaw a future where qualitative and quantitative approaches will “shift from basic CA to ‘applied’ analysis and back again” (p. 73).

References

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Heritage, J. (1999). Conversation analysis at century's end: Practices of talk-in- interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32, 69–76.

McCabe, R., Leudar, I., Healey, P. G. T (2006). What do you think I think? Theory of Mind and schizophrenia. Proceedings of XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1443–1448.

Schegloff, E. A. (1999). What next?: Language and social Interaction study at the Century's Turn. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32, 141–148.

Tuckett, D. (1993). Some thoughts on the presentation and discussion of the clinical material of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 1175–

Tuckett, D. (2012). Some reflections on psychoanalytic technique: In need of core concepts or an archaic Ritual? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 87–108.