The Handbook of Conversation Analysis & Emotion in Interaction.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7565/landp.2013.003Abstract
Reviewing Conversation Analysis (CA) “at the Century’s Turn”, Emanuel A. Schegloff predicted the “further development of our understanding of the organization of talk and other conduct in interaction itself” and to “register the particularities of its realization” (Schegloff 1999, p. 142). John Heritage (1999), additionally, foresaw a future where qualitative and quantitative approaches will “shift from basic CA to ‘applied’ analysis and back again” (p. 73).
References
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Heritage, J. (1999). Conversation analysis at century's end: Practices of talk-in- interaction, their distributions, and their outcomes. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32, 69–76.
McCabe, R., Leudar, I., Healey, P. G. T (2006). What do you think I think? Theory of Mind and schizophrenia. Proceedings of XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1443–1448.
Schegloff, E. A. (1999). What next?: Language and social Interaction study at the Century's Turn. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 32, 141–148.
Tuckett, D. (1993). Some thoughts on the presentation and discussion of the clinical material of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74, 1175–
Tuckett, D. (2012). Some reflections on psychoanalytic technique: In need of core concepts or an archaic Ritual? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 32, 87–108.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This is an Open Access journal. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated.
Please read our Open Access, Copyright and Permissions policies for more information.
