Transience and Lack of Being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7565/landp.2013.006Abstract
The essay aims at reading Freud’s essay “On Transience” through the prism of Lacanian psychoanalytic theory. The claim of the essay is that transience results from the subject’s inability to ensnare the present in its actuality. On account of the unbridgeable gap between the subject’s supposed initial perception and its symbolization, the world is present to the subject only insofar as it already belongs to the past. It follows that the subject can neither achieve coalescence with itself nor discover the world around him in a complete fashion. What is lost in the symbolized present is either fantasized in the past or anticipated in the future. In Lacan’s perspective, these fantasies are never fulfilled: the actual present is utterly impossible in the discursive reality of the human subject. In this way, the Lacanian thesis that every drive is a death drive is reaffirmed in this essay: since there is nothing outside the symbolic order for Lacan, the present in its actuality can only be associated with the death of the subject. Furthermore, the essay argues that the present as such is nothing other than an impossible event of temporal being which is, however, essential for the constitution of time.
References
Evans, D. (1996). An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)
Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian subject: Between language and jouissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fink, B. (1995). The real cause of repetition. In R. Feldstein, B. Fink & M. Jaanus (Eds.), Reading seminar XI: Lacan’s four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (pp. 223-232). New York, NY: SUNY Press.
Freud, S. (1966). The aetiology of hysteria. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Early psycho-analytic Publications (Vol. 3) (pp. 159-188). (J. Strachey, Trans.). London, UK: The
Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1896)
Freud, S. (1966). The project for scientific psychology. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Pre-psycho-analytic publications and unpublished drafts (Vol. 1) (pp. 283-398). (J. Strachey, Trans.). London, UK: The Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1895)
Freud, S. (1991). A note upon the ‘mystic writing-pad’.” In J. Strachey (Ed.), On metapsychology (Vol. 11) (pp. 427-434). (J. Strachey, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1925)
Freud, S. (1991). The unconscious. In J. Strachey (Ed.), On metapsychology (Vol. 11) (pp. 167-222). (J. Strachey, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1915)
Freud, S. (1997). On transience. In W. Hamacher & D. Wellbery (Eds.), Writings in art and literature (pp. 176-179). (J. Strachey, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1916)
Homer, S. (2005). Jacques Lacan. London, UK: Routledge.
Kierkegaard, S. (1983). Repetition. In H. Hong & E. Hong (Eds.), Kierkegaard’s writing VI: fear and trembling/repetition (pp. 125-232). (H. Hong & E. Hong, Trans.).
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1843)
Lacan, J. (1981). Seminar XI: The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. J.-A. Miller. (Ed.). (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company,
Inc. (Original work published 1973)
Lacan, J. (1988). Seminar XX: Encore. On feminine sexuality. The limits of love and knowledge. J.-A. Miller. (Ed.). (B. Fink, Trans.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1975)
Lacan, J. (1991). Seminar I: Freud’s papers on technique. J.-A. Miller. (Ed.). (J. Forrester, Trans.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1975)
Lacan, J. (1992). Seminar VII: The ethics of psychoanalysis. J.-A. Miller. (Ed.). (D. Porter, Trans.). London, UK: Tavistock/Routledge. (Original work published 1986)
Lacan, J. (1995). The position of unconscious. (B. Fink, Trans.). In R. Feldstein, B. Fink & M. Jaanus (Eds.), Reading seminar XI: Lacan’s four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (pp.259-282).NewYork,NY: SUNYPress.
Lacan, J. (2012). The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In B. Fink (Ed.), Écrits.(pp. 197-268). (B. Fink, Trans.). London, UK: W.W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1966)
Lacan, J. (2012). Logical time and the assertion of anticipated certainty. In B. Fink (Ed.), Écrits. (pp. 161-175). (B. Fink, Trans.). London, UK: W.W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1966)
Pluth, E., & Hoens, D. (2009). What if the Other is stupid? Badiou and Lacan on ‘logical time’. In P. Hallward (Ed.), Think again: Alain Badiou and the future of philosophy (pp. 182-190). London, UK: Continuum.
Stavrakakis, Y. (1999). Lacan and the political. London, UK: Routledge.
Verhaeghe, P. (2002). Lacan’s answer to the classical mind/body deadlock: retracing Freud’s beyond. In S. Barnard & B. Fink (Eds.), Reading seminar XX: Lacan’s major work on love, knowledge, and feminine sexuality (pp. 109-140). New York, UK: SUNY Press.
Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London, UK: Verso.
Žižek, S. (1992). Enjoy your symptom: Jacques Lacan in hollywood and out. London, UK: Routledge.
Žižek, S. (1993). Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel, and the critique of ideology. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This is an Open Access journal. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated.
Please read our Open Access, Copyright and Permissions policies for more information.
