Sensationalism and Supersensibility: Eighteenth-Century Literary Terror Divided
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2218/forum.02.557Abstract
Schiller and Lewis present a polarity dividing Coleridge’s judgement of literary terror: Schiller, the unparalled artist of sublime terror, and Lewis, the most objectionable of gothic writers. Although Coleridge’s responses are in many ways linked to his own unique concerns, they also reflect the divided status of terror in the wider culture of the time. And if we want to understand this divided status, it is useful to turn to a characteristically Coleridgean question: is sensation transcended? This question has two distinct but related components: firstly, is the literary work addressed to higher faculties rather than the senses, and secondly, does the literary work itself depict a world with a supersensible realm?Downloads
Published
05-Jun-2006
Issue
Section
Articles
License
This is an Open Access journal. All material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, unless otherwise stated.
Please read our Open Access, Copyright and Permissions policies for more information.
How to Cite
“Sensationalism and Supersensibility: Eighteenth-Century Literary Terror Divided”. 2006. FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & The Arts, no. 02 (June). https://doi.org/10.2218/forum.02.557.