Métodos de talla y estrategias de reducción en la fabricación de foliáceos en el III milenio A.N.E. [Knapping methods and reduction strategies in leaf-like projectile production in the 3rd millennia B.C.E.]

  • Miquel Guardiola Fígols Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social
  • Juan Ignacio Morales Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social
Keywords: leaf-like arrow points, blanks, rough-outs, pressure flaking methods, bifacial knapping strategies

Abstract


In this paper we present a technological study of leaf-like arrow points recovered in an open-air site from the 3th millennium B.C., named El Tossal de La Munda (Vistabella del Maestrazgo, Castellón). It is located at the central east of Spain, in the southern part of Iberian range in a mountainous area about 100 km far from the coast. The site is on a small flat-topped hill of about 5000 m² and it is 820 m.a.s.l. The upper surface has been strongly eroded and the lithic material has been found directly on the bedrock or over the dissolution clays. We recovered close to 5000 lithic remains, offering an assemblage mainly produced in the 3rd millennia BC: retouched blades and flakes as main groups, leaf-like arrow points, in addition to some other retouched tools as segments (one triangle, one bifacial circle and a trapezoid), scrapers, end-scrapers, denticulate and notches, one raclette and one drill. We also found two small adzes. The cores were intensively exhausted. Just some of them show bladelet scars but most of them are small discoid and irregular shaped cores for the production of small flakes. Few of them show marks of bipolar flaking on anvil.
Within the lithic assemblage there is a sample of 73 bifacial rough-outs and projectile points at different reduction stages, from initial blanks to finished and used ones. In addition, we found one refit and one conjoint. All of them are leaf-like arrow points except a fragment showing shoulders as an exception. We have identified some typical accidents in bifacial reduction: fractured rough-outs, overshot flakes, overshot negatives and another accident that we named “bending notches”, linked principally to the pressure technique (two positives and two negatives). We analysed both preforms and finished leaf-like arrow points from a technological point of view, first trying to identify the blank type and shape, and secondly trying to distinguish knapping methods and techniques.
We have divided the methods in three main types: parallels (adjacent and contiguous), alternating, and independent method. We have identified the strategies according to edges and blank faces management. In our case, only simple combinations has been detected, mainly alternate (first one face, after the other side on the same edge). We have divided leaf-like production in five technical stages, and we described the identified knapping methods and strategies used at the site according to the reduction stage. In order to show this, we describe in the paper the most significant cases of the site.
The identification of blanks has been possible in most of the rough-outs, verifying that the blanks used at the site were irregular and cortical flakes, chunks, fissure slabs and small cores. Despite this, leaf-like production at the site was really homogeneous, applying the same methods and also managing the blank faces similarly. Alternate strategy is completely dominant, firstly removing the ventral face, secondly the dorsal part. The main knapping method used at the site is the independent method, removing consecutively the most highlighted ridges. When the sketch is advanced and reaches a regular shape, the application of parallel method series is common. Technically we have observed two phases: first direct percussion (mainly with stone hammer); second, pressure technique. Heat modifications have been detected in 20 rough-outs and projectiles but most of them seem to be non-intentional, exhibiting cupules and cracks. Most of the finished ones do not show double shine (heat patina).
According to this, we state that leaf-like production at the site was not a specialized process but it recovers to use as blanks previously discarded flakes, chunks and exhausted cores, part of them recycled before burning. The elaboration of leaf-like arrow points was embedded in the laminar production, and it played a marginal role within a lithic reduction system that is focused on blade and bladelet production. They used mainly cortical and non-cortical flakes, that seem to be by-products of blade core preparation, or exhausted cores that were reused for this purpose.
Despite most of the arrow points result in crude and thick foliated shapes, we argue that in this technological context, the use of waste as blanks constrains the knapping reduction, and lead to rude shapes. Derived from this, we discuss on the leaf-like arrow point morphology and its profitability, the resistance of thick-elliptical tips and their role in the technological framework of the site and its landscape. We also discuss about the visibility of the skilled knapping in this context, when small, irregular and cortical flakes, burned chunks and exhausted cores were used as a blank to make leaf-like projectiles.

Author Biographies

Miquel Guardiola Fígols, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social
IPHES: Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social. 
C/ Marcelí Domingo, s/n, 43007 
Tarragona 
Cataluña
Juan Ignacio Morales, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social
IPHES: Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social.
C/ Marcelí Domingo, s/n, 43007 
Tarragona 
Cataluña

References

Baena, J. 1998, Tecnología lítica experimental. Introducción a la talla de utillaje Prehistórico. British Archaeological Reports International Series Vol. 721, Archaeopress, Oxford, 236 p. (in Spanish) (“Experimental lithic technology. Introduction to the knapping of Prehistoric tools”)
Bleed, P. 2002, Obviously sequential, but continuous or staged? Refits and cognition in three late Paleolithic assemblages from Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21: 329-343. (en inglés; in English) (“Obviamente secuencial, pero continuado o en etapas? Remontajes y cognición en tres conjuntos líticos del Paleolítico tardío de Japón”) doi:10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00001-6.
Bradley, B.A. 1982, Flaked stone technology and typology. En: The Agate Basin Site; A Record of the Paleoindian Occupation of the Northwestern High Plains, (Frison, G.C. & Stanford, D.J., Eds.), Academic Press, New York: p. 181-208.(en inglés; in English) (“Tecnología y tipología de la piedra tallada”)
Callahan, E. 1979, The basics of biface knapping in the eastern fluted points tradition: A manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America Vol. 7(1), Eastern States Archaeological Federation, Washington, 180 p. (en inglés; in English) (“Los fundamentos de la talla bifacial en la tradición de las puntas encanaladas orientales: Un manual para los talladores y los analistas de industria lítica”)
Cotterell, B. & Kamminga, L. 1979, The mechanics of flaking. En: Lithic Use Wear-Analysis (Hayden, B., Ed.),Academic Press, New York San Francisco, London: p. 97-112. (en inglés; in English) (“La mecánica de talla”)
Cotterell, B. & Kamminga, J. 1987, The formation of flakes. American Antiquity, 52(4): 675-708. (en inglés; in English) (“La formación de lascas”) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/281378
Dockall, J.E. 1997, Wear traces and projectile impact: A review of the experimental and archaeological evidence. Journal of Field Archaeology, 24(3): 32-331. (en inglés; in English) (“Trazas de desgaste y impacto del proyectil: Una revisión de la evidencia experimental y arqueológica”) doi:10.1179/009346997792208113
Eren, M.I., Patten, R.J., O’Brien, M.J. & Meltzer, D.J., 2013, Refuting the technological cornerstone of the Ice-Age Atlantic crossing hypothesis. Journal of Archaeological Science, 40: 2934-2941. (en inglés; in English) (“Refutando la base tecnológica de la hipótesis de la travesía del Atlántico en la Edad de Hielo”) doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.02.031
Eren, M.I., Patten, R.J., O’Brien, M.J. & Meltzer, D.J., 2014 More on the rumor of “intentional overshot flaking” and the purported ice-age Atlantic crossing. Lithic Technology, 39(1): 55-63. (en inglés; in English) (“Más sobre el rumor del sobrepasado bifacial intencional y la supuesta travesía del Atlántico en la edad de hielo”) doi:10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000033
Fernández, J., Gibaja, J.F. & Palomo, A., 2008, Geométricos y puntas usadas como proyectiles en contextos neolíticos en la fachada mediterránea. En: Actas IV Congreso del Neolítico Peninsular (Hernández-Pérez, M.S., Soler-Díaz, J.A. & López-Padilla, J.A., Eds.), Museo Arqueológico de Alicante, Alicante: p. 305-312. (In Spanish) (“Geometrics and arrows used as a projectile in Neolithic contexts at the Spanish Mediterranean coast”).
Faus, E. 2011, Experimentación e interpretación: El ejemplo de La Figuereta. Un taller de puntas de flecha del Neolítico final localizado en el poblado de Les Jovades (Cocentaina, Alicante, España). En: La investigación experimental aplicada a la arqueología (Morgado, A., Baena, J., García-González, D., Eds.), Departamento de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad de Granada, Granada: p. 149-156. (in Spanish) (“Experimentation and interpretation: An example from La Figuereta. A Final Neolithic arrow-point workshop from Les Jovades, Cocentaina, Alicante, Spain”).
Fischer, A., Vemming, P. &Rasmussen, P., 1984, Macro and micro wear traces on lithic projectile points. Journal of Danish Archaeology, 3: 19-46. (en inglés; in English) (“Trazas de desgaste macro y micro en proyectiles líticos”) doi:10.1080/0108464X.1984.10589910
Guardiola, M., Moralesa, J.I. &Vergès J.M., enprensa, From blunt to cutting: Distinguishing alternating method flakes in early stages on rounded blanks. Quaternary International.(en inglés; in English) (“De obtuso a cortante: Distinguiendo las lascas del método alternante en las primeras estadios de talla sobre soportes redondeados) doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.08.039
Hughes, S.S., 1998, Getting to the point: Evolutionary changes in prehistoric weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5 (4): 354-408. (en inglés; in English) (“Alcanzar la punta: cambios evolutivos en las armas prehistóricas”) doi:10.1007/BF02428421
Inizan, M.L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H., Tixier, J., 1995, Technologie de lapierretaillée. Préhistoire d e l a Pierr e Taillé Vol. 4, CREP, Nanterre, 199 p. (en francés; in French) (“Knapped stone technology”).
Inizan, M.L., Reduron-Ballinger, M., Roche, H. &Tixier, J., 1999, Technology and Terminology of Knapped Stone. CREP (5), Nanterre, 189 p.(en inglés; in English) (“Tecnología y terminología de la piedratallada”)
Liesau, C., Blasco, C., Ríos, P., Vega, J., Menduiña, R., Blanco, J.F., Baena, J., Herrera, T., Petri, A. & Gómez, J.L., 2008, Un espacio compartido por vivos y muertos: El poblado calcolítico de fosos de Camino de las Yeseras (San Fernando de Henares, Madrid). Complutum, 19(1): 97-120. (in Spanish) (“A shared space by the living and the dead: The copper-age trench village from Camino de las Yeseras (San Fernando de Henares, Madrid”).
Lohse, J.C., Collins, M.B. & Bradley, B.A., 2012, Controlled overshot flaking: A response to Eren, Patten, O’Brien and Meltzer. Lithic Technology, 39(1): 46-54. (en inglés; in English) (“Sobre-pasado bifacial controlado: Una respuesta a Eren, Patten, O’Brien z Meltzer”) doi:10.1179/0197726113Z.00000000032
Odell, G.H.& Cowan, F. 1986, Experiments with spears and arrows on animal targets. Journal of Field Archaeology, 13(2): 195-212. (en inglés; in English) (“Experimentos con lanzas y flechas contra cuerpos de animales”) doi:10.1179/009346986791535780
Pelegrin, J. 1991, Les savoir-faire: Une très longue histoire. Terrain, 16: 107-113. (en francés; in French) (“The know-how: A very long history”) doi:10.4000/terrain.3001
Pelegrin, J. 2005, Remarks about archaeological techniques and methods of knapping: Elements of cognitive approach to stone knapping. En: Stone Knapping: the Necessary Conditions for a Uniquely Hominin Behavior (Russon, A.E., Begun, D.R., Eds.). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge: p. 159-169. (en inglés; in English) (“Observacionessobre las técnicas y métodos de talla arqueológicos: Elementos de enfoquecognitivo para la talla lítica”)
Ríos, P. 2011, Territorio y sociedad en la región de Madrid durante el III milenio AC: El referente del yacimiento de Camino de las Yeseras. PatrimonioArqueológico de Madrid Vol. 7, Madrid, 692 p. (in Spanish) (“Territory and society at Madrid region during the III millennia B.C.E.: The reference of Camino de las Yeseras site”).
Stanford, D.J. & Bradley B.A., 2012, Across Atlantic Ice: The Origin of America’s Clovis Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley, 336 p. (en inglés; in English) (“A travésdelhielo del Atlántico: El origen de la cultura Clovis de América”)
Stout, D., Apel, J., Commander, J. & Roberts, M. 2014, Late Acheulean technology and cognition at Boxgrove, UK.Journal of Archaeological Science, 41: 576-590. (en inglés; in English) (“La tecnología y cogniciónAchelense Final enBoxgrove, ReinoUnido”) doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.001
Tixier, J. 1967, Procédées d’analyse et questions de terminologie concernant l’étude des ensembles industriels du Paléolithique récent et de l’Epipaléolithique dans l’Afrique du Nord-Ouest.En:Background to Evolution in Africa(Bishop, W. W., Desmond Clark, J., Eds.), Chicago University Press, Chicago: p. 771–820. (en francés; in French) (“Analysis processes and terminology issues concerning the study of Upper Paleolithic and Epipalaeolithic assemblages in Northwest Africa).
Vegas, J.I. 1999, El enterramiento neolítico de San Juan Ante Portam Latinam. Diputación Foral de Álava,Vitoria, 294 p. (in Spanish) (“The Neolithic burial of San Juan Ante Portam Latinam”).
Whittaker, J.C., 1994. Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools. University of Texas Press, Austin, 341 p. (en inglés; in English) (“Talla de silex: Fabricando y entendiendo las herramientas de piedra”)
Published
15-Sep-2015
How to Cite
Guardiola Fígols, M., & Morales, J. (2015). Métodos de talla y estrategias de reducción en la fabricación de foliáceos en el III milenio A.N.E. [Knapping methods and reduction strategies in leaf-like projectile production in the 3rd millennia B.C.E.]. Journal of Lithic Studies, 2(2), 95-117. https://doi.org/10.2218/jls.v2i2.1498
Section
Research Articles