2 2 36-44 2016

An Intraspeaker Variation Study of Scottish English /r/ Pharyngealisation

Ruaridh Purse, Euan McGill

Abstract


Pharyngealisation— the retraction of the tongue towards the pharynx— of prepausal and preconsonantal /r/ has been recognised as an emergent strategy of derhoticisation in Scotland’s  Central Belt (Stuart-Smith 2007). However, previous studies have focused on the incidence of this phenomenon between speakers, with little attention paid to intraspeaker variation. The question remains: How does Scottish English derhoticisation behave in a situation of style shifting? We explore the intraspeaker variation of comedian Frankie Boyle, a recognisable speaker of Scottish English, comparing his production of apical and pharyngealised /r/ in prepausal and preconsonantal environments in two interview contexts. The acoustic correlates of /r/ pharyngealisation are characterised as a rise in F3 with reduced energy in the formant. This is quite different from the plummeting F3 associated with an apical realisation of /r/, allowing for a binary categorisation of pharyngeal and apical tokens as well as an analysis of F3 frequency as a continuous measure.

We present evidence that Boyle makes significantly more frequent use of pharyngealisation when interviewed by Kevin Bridges, a fellow Glasgow native, than by Richard Osman, a Southern Standard British English (SSBE) speaker. Further, a secondary analysis of phonation quality shows that Boyle uses significantly more creaky voice with Osman than with Bridges, allowing for a fuller understanding of Boyle’s style in each context. Attempts to attribute the observed differences in pharyngealisation rate to factors other than interview context (e.g., linguistic factors or discussion topic) yielded insignificant results, further reinforcing the notion that the style shift is due to interview context. Even within the binary categories of pharyngeal vs. apical, an analysis of formant frequency found that, on average, Boyle produced “ more apical”  apicals with Osman (lower plummeting F3) and “ more pharyngeal”  pharyngeals with Bridges (higher rising F3), suggesting that these forms are dynamic and can be strategically produced to varying degrees. This evident style shift between interview contexts is an ideal platform for a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of various sociolinguistic theories. Ultimately, we conclude that audience design best captures the interactional effects observed, but reference to second order indexicality is required to understand what social meaning Boyle achieves through style shifting.


Keywords


style shifting; intraspeaker variation; sociophonetics; Scotland

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2):145–204.

Bell, Allan. 2001. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. P. Eckert and J. Rickford, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2014. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer programme, Version 5.4.01]. Accessed 10 November 2014, URL http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/

Coupland, Nikolas. 1980. Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9(1):1–12.

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–476.

Edinburgh International Television Festival. 2014. GEITF 2014—Frankie Boyle: State of a TV nation [YouTube video]. Accessed 8 November 2014, URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MRz9RPlsDQ

Esling, John. 1978. The identification of features of voice quality in social groups. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 8(1–2):18–23.

Giles, Howard, and Peter Powesland. 1997. Accommodation theory. In Sociolinguistics: A Reader, ed. N. Coupland and A. Jaworski, 232–239. Basingstoke: MacMillan.

Grant, William. 1913. The Pronunciation of English in Scotland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gumperz, John J. 1982. Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hay, Jennifer, Stefanie Jannedy, and Norma Mendoza-Denton. 1999. Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style. In ICPhS-14, ed. J. J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, and A. C. Bailey, 1389–1392. San Francisco, CA: ICPhS.

Ingalls, Matt. 2012. Soundflower 1.6.2 [Computer software]. Cycling ‘74.

Johnstone, Barbara and Scott Kiesling. 2008. Indexicality and experience: Exploring the meanings of /aw/-monophthongization in Pittsburgh. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(1):5–33.

Kerswill, Paul. 2003. Dialect levelling and geographical diffusion in British English. In Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill, eds. D. Britain and J. Cheshire, 223–243. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.

Lawson, Eleanor, James Scobbie, and Jane Stuart-Smith. 2013. Bunched /r/ promotes vowel movement to schwar: An ultrasound tongue imagery study of Scottish sociophonetic variation. Journal of Phonetics 41(3–4):198–210.

Lodge, Ken. 2009. A Critical Introduction to Phonetics. London: Continuum.

Love, Jessica, and Abby Walker. 2013. Football versus football: Effect of topic on /r/ realization in American and English sports fans. Language and Speech 56(4):443–460.

MacAfee, Caroline. 1983. Varieties of English around the World: Glasgow. Amsterdam, Benjamins.

Macauley, Ronald. 1977. Language, Social Class and Education: A Glasgow Study. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Mazzoni, Dominic, and Roger Dannenberg. 2000. Audacity [Computer software, Version 2.0.6]. Accessed 10 November 2014, URL http://old.audacityteam.org/download/

Plug, Leendert, and Richard Ogden. 2003. A parametric approach to the phonetics of postvocalic /r/ in Dutch. Phonetica 60(3):159–186.

Podesva, Robert. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4):478–504.

Romaine, Suzanne. 1980. Stylistic variation and evaluative reactions to speech: Problems in the investigation of linguistic attitudes in Scotland. Language and Speech 23(3):213–232.

Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Investigating stylistic variation. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. J. K. Chambers and Natalie Schilling. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3–4):193–229.

Some Decent Videos. 2014, August 24. Kevin Bridges interviews Frankie Boyle [YouTube video]. Accessed 29 October 2014, URL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpnoyQpVspE

Stuart-Smith, Jane. 1999. Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, ed. P. Foulkes, and G. J. Docherty, 201–222. Leeds, UK: Arnold.

Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2007. A sociophonetic investigation of postvocalic /r/ in Glaswegian adolescents. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. J. Trouvain and W.J. Barry, 1449–1452. Saarbrücken, Germany.

Stuart-Smith, Jane, Eleanor Lawson, and James Scobbie. 2014. Derhoticisation in Scottish English: A sociophonetic journey. In Advances in Sociophonetics, ed. C. Celata and S. Calamai, 59–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Stuart-Smith, Jane, Clare Timmins, and Fiona Tweedie. 2007. ‘Talkin’ Jockney?’ Variation and change in Glaswegian accent. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2):221–260.

Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the Urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2):179–195.

Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wells, John. 1982. Accents of English I: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wolfram, Walter. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Urban Language Series 5. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.2218/ls.v2i2.2016.1612

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2057-1720 (Online)