Achieving Native-like Pronunciation through Phonetic Analysis and Poetry

  • Maria Dokovova The University of Cambridge
Keywords: intraspeaker variation, third language acquisition, French


The problem of identifying phonetic phenomena related to language transfer and correction in second language (L2) production can be approached by conducting broad analyses of the same L2 speaker. This approach is applied in the present study, which investigates errors of pronunciation segmentally (grammatical mistakes, voicing of consonants, and vowel distinctions) and suprasegmentally (intonation and time-gaining techniques) in order to establish the possibility of their being corrected in two recordings of readings by a non-native French speaker. The errors from the first recording were identified, analyzed, and corrected through pronunciation exercises with the aim of raising awareness of the problems to help overcome them on the second reading attempt. The correction methods involved exercises such as reading poetry aloud, pronouncing consonantal segments in various vocalic environments, and reading the target text, syllable by syllable. In addition, the analysis investigates the possibility of phonetic transfer from the two primary languages of the speaker: Bulgarian and English. The researcher is the speaker, the methodological implications of which are discussed, reaching the overall conclusion that it helps to raise awareness of the phonetic background of the errors. Despite the risk of compromising the data through this methodological choice, the results show that a high level of attention and monitoring of the speech alone may be insufficient for internalizing corrections. While grammatical mistakes were corrected most effectively, other segmental and suprasegmental features showed different levels of success. One of the features (the /ɛ/ and /e/ distinction) even exhibited deterioration in the second recording. These examples suggest the presence of “equivalence classification” phenomena and raise the question of the appropriateness of the phonetic exercises for overcoming the errors. Another area of interest was determining the source of errors such as “uptalk”, the reassigning of grammatical gender, word-final devoicing, and elimination of syllable-initial lenis stop prevoicing. Due to the limited amount of data available, it was difficult to draw firm conclusions, but the tendencies observed suggested that the errors might be due to transfer from the speaker’s primary languages, whose influence appeared to be equal. Further research should therefore control for the influence of the two primary languages and extend the scope to include a second post-training recording. Overall, the second recording demonstrated that raised awareness and training helped to achieve acceptable production in the suprasegmental features as well as most of the instances of unfamiliar phones, such as /ʁ/, front-rounded vowels, and nasal vowels.


Aljaafreh, Ali, and James P. Lantolf. 1994. Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal 78(4):465–483.
Ashwell, Tim. 2000. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing 9(3):227–257.
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 1992–2015. Praat [Computer software]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Collins French Dictionary. 2015. [Online dictionary]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Dilley, Laura C. and Meredith Brown. 2005. The RaP (Rhythm and Pitch) labelling system [Manual, Version 1.0]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Durand, Jacques, Basilio Calderone, Bernard Laks, and Atanas Tchobanov. 2011. Que savons-nous de la liaison aujourd’hui? Langue Française 169:103–35.
Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen, and Rosemary Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28:339–368.
Ferris, Dana R. 2004. The “Grammar Correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13(1):49–62.
Flege, James Emil, and James Hillenbrand. 1987. A differential effect of release bursts on the stop voicing judgments of native French and English listeners. Journal of Phonetics 15:203–8.
Frenchsounds. 2010a, 5 July. Prononciation de la voyelle française /Ø/ [Video]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Frenchsounds. 2010b, 5 July. Prononciation de la voyelle nasale /ɛ̃/ [Video]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Frenchsounds. 2010c, 19 October. Les trois “e” du français [Video]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Frenchsounds. 2010d, 19 November. Trois voyelles arrondies: /ø/, /oe/ et /ə/ [Video]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Frenchsounds. 2011, 7 May. Spelling-sound correlations for the nasal vowel /ɑ̃/, with exceptions [Video]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Frenchsounds. 2012, 18 February. Pronouncing the French /r/ with all the vowels [Video]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Guénette, Danielle. 2007. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Journal of Second Language Writing 16(1):40–53.
Hattori, Kota, and Paul Iverson. 2008. English /r/–/l/ pronunciation training for Japanese speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5):3327.
Hilton, Heather. 2008. The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal 36(2):153–66.
Kamber, Alain, and Carine Skupien-Dekens. 2010. La correction phonétique en français langue étrangère: Enseignement et évaluation en laboratoire multimédia. Recherche et Pratiques Pédagogiques en Langues de Spécialité XXIX(2):89–102.
Kamiyama, Takeki, and Jacqueline Vaissière. 2009. Perception and production of French close and close-mid rounded vowels by Japanese-speaking learners. Phonétique, Bilinguisme et Acquisition 2:9–41. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Kessinger, Richard, and Sheila Blumstein. 1997. Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics 25:143–68.
Lennon, Paul. 2000. The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In Perspectives on Fluency, ed. H. Riggenbach, 25–42. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Martin, Philippe. 2009. Intonation du Francais. Paris: Armand Coin.
Ohala, John. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In The Production of Speech, ed. P. MacNeilage, 189–216. New York: Springer Verlag.
Ringen, Catherine, and Vladimir Kulikov. 2012. Voicing in Russian stops: Cross-linguistic implications. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20(2):269–86.
Sancier Michelle L. and Carol A. Fowler 1997. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics 25:421–436.
Schuh, Russell. 2008. The feature [voice] and boundaries in Bulgarian [UCLA sample paper]. Accessed 15 May 2015, URL
Ternes, Elmar, and Tatiana Vladimirova-Buhtz. 1990. Bulgarian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 20(1):45–47.
Tobin, Stephen, and Hosung Nam. 2010. Asymmetries in Spanish-English gestural drift [Presentation slides]. Accessed 15 May, URL
Tomlinson, John M., and Jean E. Fox Tree. 2011. Listeners’ comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech. Cognition 119(1):58–69.
Vanlocke, Janey. 2011. On the production of aspiration and prevoicing: The effect of training on native speakers of Belgian Dutch. Master’s thesis, Universiteit Gent.
Vigny, Alfred. 1987. Poemes Antiques et Modernes/Les Destinees. Ed. A. Jarry. Paris: Editions Flammarion.
Vuletić, Branko. 1966. Système des fautes et correction phonétique des français qui apprennent l’anglais. Revue de Phonétique 1:1–39.
Walz, Joel. 1980. An empirical study of pronunciation errors in French. The French Review 53(3):424–32.
How to Cite
Dokovova, M. “Achieving Native-Like Pronunciation through Phonetic Analysis and Poetry”. Lifespans and Styles, Vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 63-78, doi:10.2218/ls.v2i1.2016.1431.