Does Geographic Relocation Induce the Loss of Features from a Single Speaker’s Native Dialect?

  • Hollie Barker The University of Manchester
Keywords: lifespan change, intraspeaker variation, sociophonetics, second dialect acquisition


Over the past few years, academics such as Sankoff and Blondeau (2007) and Harrington (2006) have exhibited a marked interest in dialect variation and language change across the lifespan. Though it was acknowledged that individuals could temporarily adapt their language to accommodate to other interlocutors, permanent changes to their underlying grammar were previously thought impossible. What has come to light, however, is that as individuals we have been given increasing opportunities to be much more mobile; and as a result, our language has too. The aim of this study is to provide evidence for the claim that social and geographical mobility (in this case geographical) can cause an individual’s language to change. It was motivated by the belief that language cannot change after an individual has surpassed the critical period. The study focuses on one individual speaker in particular: the musician Ringo Starr. The speaker in question lived in Liverpool until the age of 40, before relocating to America. The data for this investigation were sourced from a number of TV and Radio interviews with Starr, taken from 20 years prior to and 20 years after his geographic relocation. In both cases, the interlocutors were speakers of British and American English varieties. The study examines three stable variables that exist in the speaker’s native dialect of Liverpool English — realisation of /t/ to /r/, non-rhoticity, and NURSE ~ SQUARE merger — and investigates whether these remain stable features, are lost completely, or are altered by geographical relocation. The study found that, although the speaker did not lose any features of his native dialect completely, the salience of the variables was affected by the move to the US. The speaker reduced his levels of /t/ to /r/ realisation and became more rhotic in certain phonological and lexical contexts. He retained the NURSE ~ SQUARE merger, but the results showed that he increased his frequency of F1 of NURSE vowels, articulating them slightly lower. Starr never acquired new, American variables such as the alveolar flap. What these results demonstrate is that an individual is capable of changing their language after the supposed “critical period”; it shows that not all change can be attributed to temporary accommodation. Dialect contact with varieties of American English appears to have resulted in some changes to Starr’s grammar.


Asprey, Esther C. 2007. Investigating residual rhoticity in a non-rhotic accent. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 12:78–101.
Audacity. 2015. Audacity (R): Free audio editor and recorder [Computer programme, Version 2.0.0]. Accessed 1 December 2014, URL
BBC News. 2007. What is working class? [Online magazine]. Accessed 15 December 2015, URL
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2015. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer programme, Version 5.4.15]. Accessed 1 November 2014, URL
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Karen P. Corrigan, Anders Holmberg, Patrick Honeybone, and Warren Maguire. 2013. T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics 17(1):85–128.
Chambers, Jack K. 1992. Dialect Acquisition. Language 68(4):673–705.
ELAN. n.d. The language archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics [Computer programme]. Accessed 1 November 2014, URL
FAVE. n.d. Forced alignment and vowel extraction [Computer programme]. Accessed 1 December 2014, URL
Harrington, Jonathon. 2006. An acoustic analysis of ‘happy-tensing’ in the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34(4):439–457.
Honeybone, Patrick. 2001. Lenition inhibition in Liverpool English. English Language and Linguistics 5(2):219–246.
Honeybone, Patrick. 2010. ‘How symmetrical are English vowels?’ Yazyk i rechevaya deyatel’nost’ (Language and Language Behaviour). Journal of the Linguistic Society of St. Petersburg 9:33–63.
Liberman, Mark. 2014. Introduction to Linguistics [Online lecture slides, University of Edinburgh]. Accessed 15 December 2014, URL
Marotta, Giovanna, and Marlen Barth. 2005. Acoustic and sociolinguistic aspects of lenition in Liverpool English. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online 3(2):377–413.
Nycz, Jennifer. 2013. Changing words or changing rules? Second dialect acquisition and phonological representation. Journal of Pragmatics 52:49–62.
Sankoff, Gillian. 2004. Adolescents, young adults and the critical period. In Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, ed. C. Fought, 121–139. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sankoff, Gillian, and Hélèn Blondeau. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3):560–588.
Schuh, Russell G. n.d. Flapping and other fates of /t/ and /d/ in North American English [Online publication, UCLA]. Accessed 1 December 2014, URL
Trudgill, Peter. 1983. Acts of conflicting identities. In On Dialect: Social and Geographical Perspectives, ed. P. Trudgill, 141–160. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Watson, Kevin. 2007a. Illustrations of the IPA: Liverpool English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37(3):351–360.
Watson, Kevin. 2007b. The phonetics and phonology of plosive lenition in Liverpool English. Doctoral dissertation, Edge Hill College of Higher Education/Lancaster University.
Watson, Kevin, and Lynn Clark. 2013. How salient is the NURSE~SQUARE merger. English Language and Linguistics 17(2):297–323.
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English, Vol. 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xue, Steve An, and Grace Jianping Hao. 2003. Changes in the human vocal tract due to aging and the acoustic correlates of speech production: A pilot study. Journal of Speech and Language Hearing Resources, 46(3):689–701.
How to Cite
Barker, H. (11). Does Geographic Relocation Induce the Loss of Features from a Single Speaker’s Native Dialect?. Lifespans and Styles, 2(1), 27-34.